• Lunatic Writer
  • Novels & Novellas
    • Big Ledge Front
    • Big Ledge Back >
      • Big Ledge Review
      • Big Ledge More Reviews
      • Chicken Thief
      • Heaven
    • Loose Ends >
      • Loose Ends Back >
        • Loose Ends Interview
        • Reviews
    • Lunatics >
      • Lunatics: Reviews
      • Lunatics: Closer Look
    • The Draper Catalogue >
      • Reviews
    • Eta Carinae >
      • Reviews
    • Echoes
    • Letters to Icarus >
      • Letters to Icarus: a review
    • Willing >
      • The Inspiration
      • Willing: Reviews
    • Book Reviews
  • Short Fiction
    • All Saints Day
    • Sweet Melancholy
    • More Short Fiction
  • Drama
    • Willful Pursuits
    • More Willful Pursuits
    • Sproule's Folly
    • Gravity
    • Audio Drama
    • All the World's a Stage
    • Theatre Reviews
  • Astro
  • Author's Blog
  • Comments & Contacts
  • Res Naturae
    • Valhalla Provincial Park >
      • Gwillim Lakes
    • Record Ridge
    • Skattebo
    • Rock Slide Lake
    • Kootenay National Park >
      • Juniper
      • Marble Canyon
      • Paint Pots
      • Cobb Lake
      • Redstreak
      • Stanley Glacier
    • Waterton Lakes National Park >
      • Bear's Hump
      • Red Rock Canyon
      • Bertha Lake
      • Wall Lake
      • Prince of Wales
    • Old Growth Forest
    • Ripple Ridge
  • Abroad
    • Jamaica >
      • Aerial Creatures
      • Land Creatures
      • Ocean & Beach
      • Miscellaneous
    • France >
      • Paris I
      • Le Sud
      • Paris II
    • Oregon >
      • Washington
      • Cannonbeach
      • North Coast
      • Portland & Corvallis
      • Central Coast
      • Ashland
      • Crater Lake
      • Mt. Rainier
    • Belize >
      • Birds of Belize
      • Daily Life
      • Water Scenes
    • Greece >
      • Athens
      • Hydra
      • Argolid
      • Crete
      • Santorini
      • Mykonos & Delos
      • Delphi
    • Canyon Country >
      • Red Rock Canyon
      • Valley of Fire
      • Zion NP
      • Bryce Canyon NP
      • Grand Canyon
      • Sedona
    • Cuba >
      • Varadero
      • Jeep Tour
      • Havana
    • Cozumel >
      • All-Inclusive
      • Island Tour
      • Tulum
      • About Town
    • UK & Ireland >
      • London >
        • Ealing
        • Tower of London
        • Westminster
        • British Museum & the Eye
        • Thames & Greenwich
        • Victoria & Albert Museum
      • Northwest >
        • Grasmere
        • Chester
        • Liverpool
      • Southeast >
        • North Marston
        • Oxford
        • Hughenden Manor
        • Brighton
      • IRELAND >
        • Dublin
        • Killarney & Dingle
        • Muckross
      • York
      • West Midlands >
        • Hereford
        • Shrewsbury
      • Wales
      • Southwest >
        • Bath
        • Cornwall
    • Arizona >
      • Phoenix
      • Biosphere
      • Tucson
      • Nogales
      • Tombstone
      • Chiricahua
      • Kitt Peak
      • Casa Grande
  • I See You
  Lunatic Writer

Book Review: BIG LEDGE by Brian d'Eon

10/2/2018

1 Comment

 

Nascent Poet or Hotheaded Murderer?
by Sean Arthur Joyce

Picture


​Big Ledge by Brian D’Eon is that rarity in historical fiction—a story that combines historical veracity with narrative fluency and a deep poetic sensibility. D’Eon starts the tale from its endpoint, with its protagonist Robert Sproule sitting in a jail cell telling his story to a priest on the eve of his execution in 1886. Sproule is well-known to readers of Kootenay history for having been convicted of the murder of Thomas Hamill, with whom he had a dispute over ownership of the Bluebell mining claim on the east shore of Kootenay Lake.

The author captures well the colloquialisms of late 19th century speech, adding to the tale’s believability. As any skilled writer knows, dialogue is a prime vehicle for storytelling, not just for revealing plot points but quirks of speech and character. D’Eon effortlessly masters the technique, easily drawing us into the tale. He also appreciates the value of including other sensory information in the narrative. Sproule’s confession to the priest is laced with his memories of the “pristine” Kootenay country—not just its visual grandeur but its smells: “…the firs and cedar, the black earth, the wild strawberries, even the smell of the lake—each has its own smell you know—that’s how salmon know where they’re going.”

The poetic dimension enters with a secondary set of characters, the Archangel Michael and Hindu goddess Parvati, heavenly eavesdroppers whose wry asides add a funny, philosophical dimension. Poetic quotes from Blake, Shakespeare, the Bible and others are woven seamlessly throughout Sproule’s narrative, though it’s uncertain what level of education he possessed, or whether he would have had quite the broad vocabulary D’Eon imagines. The dialogue between Archangel Michael and Parvati is often laced with humour, as when Michael wonders what it is that attracts mortals to tobacco. “Ah,” Parvati answered, happy to explain: “A native custom, and a most clever means of revenge against European invaders.” The celestial pair function as a kind of Greek chorus, commenting from the wings as they debate whether Sproule is an unjustly accused prospector with a poetic nature or simply a hotheaded murderer. In so doing, D’Eon skillfully engages one of Canadian history’s great mysteries, one that—given the contradictory historical accounts—may never be solved.
​
Adding to this narrative of multiple perspectives is C.J. Woodbury, a reporter who wrote several accounts of the Sproule-Hamill trial. Speaking to his fiancée Kate Buchanan, Woodbury makes an observation that could serve as the book’s basic premise: “It was striking the way people could so quickly judge these things. As if there could be no doubt about the matter. Label someone and you no longer had to think about him as a person.” With explorations of Woodbury as well as William Baillie-Grohman, D’Eon sidesteps the trap of investing too heavily in his protagonist’s point of view.
​
D’Eon successfully applies the techniques of the novelist to flesh out what would otherwise be—at best, given what we know of Sproule and Hamill—a very short story. One of the writer’s primary tools is a sense of empathy for a story’s characters, even those with an unsavoury nature. D’Eon clearly identifies strongly with the version of Sproule he has created, and his characterization is highly appealing. For many readers, it will raise serious questions about Sproule’s guilt and the “justice” meted out to him.
You can almost smell the smoke of a miner’s campfire, curling up into a night sky not yet crowded with satellites and air pollution, lake waters lapping meditatively as the tale unwinds. D’Eon has written a historical novel that ranks with the best of them.



Picture

One of the story's principal narrators, the Hindu Goddess, Parvati

1 Comment

A Rose By Any Other Name . . .

1/25/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
Anyone who has come to know me personally may have had to endure a moment's confusion in seeing my surname spelled in two different ways: more commonly Deon, but not infrequently d'Eon. (I reserve the latter form for any published writing.) You may also find the family name rendered as D'Eon of even D'eon. The possible variant spelling has been known to cause strong feelings in certain members of the family. The blame for all this may be attributed to an ancestor who was persuaded the family might get more of the respect it deserved if its surname were changed from Duon to one that included an apostrophe, somehow ennobling it. The rest is history.

For some time I was convinced this sad and humorous tale was a quirk of my particular family, but not so apparently. It took a man like Mark Twain to enlighten me. 

Recently I stumbled across Twain's delicious shorty story called The Private History of a Campaign That Failed where Twain tells of a bumbling little militia he and his friends had formed at the beginning of the Civil War. In the end, most of the group decided that all this soldiering business was not to their taste: too much following orders and sleeping out in the cold, so they disbanded.
​

In the following excerpt Twain gives a little character sketch of one of the young men in his militia: 
 
"He was young, ignorant, good-natured, well-meaning, trivial, full of romance, and given to reading chivalric novels and singing forlorn love-ditties. He had some pathetic little nickel-plated aristocratic instincts, and detested his name, which was Dunlap; detested it, partly because it was nearly as common in that region as Smith, but mainly because it had a plebeian sound to his ear. So he tried to ennoble it by writing it in this way: d’Unlap. That contented his eye, but left his ear unsatisfied, for people gave the new name the same old pronunciation—emphasis on the front end of it. He then did the bravest thing that can be imagined, a thing to make one shiver when one remembers how the world is given to resenting shams and affectations; he began to write his name so: d’Un Lap. And he waited patiently through the long storm of mud that was flung at this work of art, and he had his reward at last; for he lived to see that name accepted, and the emphasis put where he wanted it, by people who had known him all his life, and to whom the tribe of Dunlaps had been as familiar as the rain and the sunshine for forty years."

What can I say?
​Bravo Monsieur D'Un Lap et vive la famille d'Eon!




Picture
0 Comments

The Draper Catalogue

7/13/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture

After more than a year of writing, the first draft of my novel, The Draper Catalogue, is done. (No one seems to like the title, by the way . . . I'm open to alternate suggestions.)
The genre is a departure for me. This time I've delved into the world of Sci-Fi/ Young Adult. Every part of the plot is driven by imagination--no historical facts to consider at all--well, just a few . . . .

Before starting serious work on the second draft, I would very much like to have some beta-readers have a look, give me their general impressions, what works, what doesn't, what the story still needs . . .
If you have it in your heart to tackle such a project, I would be ever grateful.

Please have a look at the first chapter and see if you're inspired to read more.




Entallay

Picture
The protagonist of my story, Henrietta Draper, spends part of her time on Earth, and part, on the planet Entallay which orbits the star HD 10307 in the constellation Andromeda. This is a real star by the way, and one very much like our sun, so that it should possess a habitable planet is quite possible.

I've used the landscape rendering program Vista Pro to create my alien landscape, a world of great oceans and multiple mountainous islands. An overhead view is shown above. Below is a view from one of the mountain tops.
​
Picture


Interested in reading more? Send me a comment.

0 Comments

The Great Dread:  More Confessions from an Unpublished Novelist

5/21/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
APRIL 22: I have an awful sense of dread about opening the latest email from my mentor:  I’ve had it for three days now, and still won’t open it.

I already have a vivid sense of how my novel manuscript is wanting. Never once have I sent my mentor a submission that didn’t seem to have serious problems with it. Nevertheless I still fantasize—quite childishly—that one day, he’ll simply pat me on the back and say, “well done, Brian, I can’t find anything I would change in this.”

My fantasies tend to run in the opposite direction for the most part: that one day, my mentor will simply throw his hands into the air and say: “I can’t waste my time with this anymore—maybe you should try your hand at water-colour painting or duck hunting…”



Picture
At my lowest moment I fear not only that I have not written a good novel, but that I’m incapable of writing a good novel. 

After all, what do I really understand about human nature? Again and again, I am tickled and surprised by plots and character development I see in books and movies. I ask myself, “if I had written that story, would my characters have been so rich, so unpredictable, so three-dimensional?”

My wife watches television dramas with a much more critical eye than me.  She regularly finds examples of dialogue and plot unbelievable where I don’t it.  I am so easily able to gloss over these inconsistencies with a forgiving eye—my all too willing suspension of disbelief—which may be okay for a member of a theatre audience, but not so much for a writer.

Human behaviour constantly surprises me—in real life, and as depicted in books and film.  Should I be so surprised?  How can I hope to write about human foibles convincingly if I seem to have no confidence in how characters would behave in a given situation?  What kind of gall do I have to even attempt such a thing?  I have never taken a psychology course in the my life.  I grew up essentially as an only child.  What do truly understand about family dynamics?  My childhood was stable and untroubled, so what do I even understand about pain and trauma?

And yet, saying all that, I still feel compelled to write, but realistically? About life the way it actually is?  More and more I am coming to think that is not the way for me…

Meanwhile, I continue with my manuscript’s autopsy…



Picture
0 Comments

Killing My Darlings:  Confessions of an Unpublished Novelist

4/26/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
April 2

The good-cop, bad-cop rhythm of responses from my mentor continues.  Mostly he likes what I have sent him this time.  And he adds “About the decision re Marcus Parent, I applaud your willingness to deal a killing blow to characters and plot lines that don’t carry their weight. Probably a good move.”

Yep, I did the deed—got rid of that new major character (the one I personally most identify with—my heart and soul.) Leaves me with no excuse now not to delve more deeply into Wernher in particular, and the other astronauts—even at the risk of boring the reader!

The manuscript is now down to about eighty thousand words—not bad, but I predict more cuts lie ahead!


Picture
0 Comments

CONFUSED:  Continuing Confessions from an Unpublished Novelist

4/22/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
March 24

Okay, well, we’re beginning to get into a rhythm here.  One time I get serious, almost devastating, criticisms from my mentor, to be followed next session by comments like “some good writing here”.  March 24 is a time for devastation.

Now the way it should work is that, after each response from my mentor, I get a clearer idea of what my novel needs.  Therefore my next submission should show that I have embraced his suggestions and incorporated them into my writing.  This is exactly what I have been trying to do.  Each time I send my mentor a section now, I very carefully edit it for POV issues, try to expunge from it unnecessary dream sequences or flashbacks, sift it for believability issues and, overall, try to give clarity a very high priority.

Much of my mentor’s objections this time do not surprise me. I have an introduced a new major character and it is not obvious to him why he’s in the story at all.  I am quite attached to his character, and he has a story line that parallels the story of Wernher and the astronauts, but does not directly interact with it.  My mentor states flatly this will not work.  I feared as much.  To remove this new character and his associated scenes will mean to cut more than fifteen thousand words from the manuscript. More importantly, it will take away thematic threads quite dear to me. In a way, it will rob the story of its soul.  That’s how it seems to me at the moment, anyway. 

Finally I am thrown by my mentor’s interpretation of a passage which he reads as meaning that I think the moon landing was a hoax—yikes! How could I have possibly given him that impression? Reading more carefully, I see this may be another case of me just not being careful enough about clarity.  Another instance of me writing it as if my story were meant to be a movie. In a movie I could count on the actor’s intonation to let the viewer know I was being sarcastic.

I like to give credit to my readers. I like to assume they will be good at reading between the lines.  For the most part however, my mentor has been pushing me the other way—make sure there is no possibility of confusion!


0 Comments

DREAMER: More Confessions from an Unpublished Novelist

4/15/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
Feb. 27

This time my mentor’s comments are fairly brief so maybe I am doing something right at last: “Some good work here. I’ve inserted some notes, mostly minor, but a couple that I think are important, re dreams and flashback.”

My mentor has previously brought up the issue of flashbacks and I have tried to deal with it. I have so many flashbacks in the manuscript.  I have tried to get rid of them where possible or write them as separate scenes chronologically in the story. Still more work to do, it seems.

The question of dreams is interesting.  My mentor argues that dreams are a cop-out for a writer and a disappointment for the reader.  I don’t think I agree with him about this, but this is not the first time I have heard this criticism so, yes, I am doing what I can to eliminate the dreams, though very much against my inclinations.

And maybe this issue is telling me something about the kind of writer I am.  Maybe I don’t really want to write “realistic” fiction, maybe I fit more easily into the magical realism genre.  And maybe this explains many of my writing problems: the fact that I just can’t decide what genre I belong in—and, proudly (foolishly probably) I have resisted being restricted to any particular genre. 

There are  five distinct dreams that I write about Lunatics—I suppose that’s a lot--although it does not seem a stretch to me that, for men orbiting the moon, far away from the familiar things of Earth, dreams would take on a larger importance than usual.


Picture
0 Comments

Confessions of an Unpublished Novelist: the Preamble

3/25/2014

1 Comment

 
Picture
Picture
So why write a novel?  I have written plenty of short stories; some have won prizes. I have also written a great many stage and radio plays which have met with some small success. Occasionally I have even dabbled in poetry.

But the novel, for better or worse, is the format by which a writer’s worth is measured.  It is THE format of our century, and many centuries before. It seems impossible to escape this fact. This is not to take away from the accomplishments of Alice Munro and many other extraordinary masters of short fiction. Yet even they would admit, I think, that the easiest way to make a name for yourself as a writer, is to write a good novel.  It is the form that the modern reader best knows, loves, and will pay money to read.

It is no different in the small corner of the writing universe where I live.  Published poets are honoured, writers whose short fiction appear in literary magazine likewise acknowledged but, if you truly want to be taken seriously, if you want to be regarded as a bona fide member of the local writing community, you need to have a published novel to your credit.

So, in part at least, writing a novel is about status.  Of course, it has nothing to do with money.  If you are writing a novel to become wealthy, you are almost certainly delusional.

Picture
Picture
Mostly, however, I wanted to write a novel to see if I could do it.  After much mulling, I think I found a story complex and interesting enough to suit the novel form.  Short stories, beautiful and poignant as they can be, necessarily restrict the writer to a smaller tale, a surgical slice in time, a close focus on a small cast of characters.

I looked forward to the "freedom" of the novel format, which would allow me to explore several thematic directions simultaneously, look for complex relationships, delve into arcane details—things like that.

In about nine months I completed the first draft of Lunatics. A very small circle of readers looked through the manuscript, proofread, left me with general impressions, helped me identify areas which needed revision and so forth. After making the appropriate revisions, “polishing” the work as writers sometimes say, I had the sense that the manuscript was ready to see the eyes of publishers.



Wrong. It wasn’t.

This I concluded after several publishers had rejected the manuscript. That being said, on two occasions, publishers did get back to me to ask to see the complete manuscript.  Apparently in the opening of the work—the first thirty pages or so—I had done ‘something’ right, enough to warrant at least some initial interest, but no more. 

It is no secret that it is probably harder today than ever to get a piece of fiction into print.  The number of Canadian publishers of fiction has shrunk almost to nothing.  Very little risk taking is going on. Breaking into the market as a new writer is a disheartening quest at best.

For many months I seriously explored the option of self-publishing or, at the very least, presenting the world with Lunatics as an e-book.  Such books are all the rage now, and the cost of turning my manuscript into an e-book would not be that great.  And the gratification would be nearly immediate when compared to the glacial pace of traditional print publishing. Besides, only months before, my novella, Eta Carinae, had been published by Vagabondage Press as an e-book, so I had already broken into the market, so to speak.
Picture
Picture
My present thinking however is that the fault lies less with publishers and more with the manuscript itself.  In other words, Lunatics, in its present state, is simply not good enough to be published.

Along with my writer friend, Ross Klatte, last fall I presented a five-part talk on writing fiction to a local group of interested retirees.  I was very hesitant about agreeing to do this.  I had no formal training as a writer.  What I knew about the craft was self-taught and largely instinctual.  Nevertheless, with help of two very good books by writers who truly did understand the craft, I went ahead and shared what I knew with my retirees.

This was a good and maybe crucial experience for me.  I certainly learned every bit as much as my audience, almost certainly more. Many of things I talked about: character, setting, voice—these were all things I felt I understood, but gradually I began to see I didn’t understand them nearly so well as I thought. The greatest boogie man of them all was the idea of STRUCTURE. Again and again I kept reading about the importance of a novel having a very clear and disciplined structure. The novelist, I was being told, if he hope for success, must follow some very specific RULES as he writes.



Picture
Picture
What was scariest of all in my research was the suggestion that revision was something much deeper than "polishing".  A second draft was not just about choosing a better adjective, discarding a repetitive sentence.  It was really about seeing that on every page and in every sentence your work obeyed these rules, that your structure was solid at every step.  True revision, it was suggested, probably meant a complete re-write of your first draft—no tinkering.  Keeping in mind all the ways in which your first draft had failed—and it was given that it would have failed—put away the draft, don’t look at it again, and rewrite from the very beginning!  Yikes!


Picture
With all these new ideas in my head and filled, at the same time, with a sense of guilt and fear, I spoke to another writer friend, Eileen Pearkes. The structure woes resonated with her—she too struggled with structural problems—and she was a successful, published writer. Why don’t you consider the Humber College Correspondence Creative Writing Course, she suggested? In this course, you are linked up to an established writer who looks through your manuscript in detail and gives you a true substantive edit. [pic]

A substantive edit… a no holds barred look at my work by someone who understood structure, who obeyed rules, and would have no hesitation about telling me where I was breaking them.  Well, I thought… this was something the work very likely needed.  And if not now, when?  Either I would forever be an ‘emerging’ writer, or I could try to take the next step.

I submitted a sample of Lunatics to Humber College.  Good enough, apparently; I was accepted into the course along with a dozen or so other writers.  I was linked up to my mentor.  Starting in the first week of January, I could expect to hear from him and we would be underway. Laying bare my writing ego to whatever assaults awaited. All during the Christmas season of 2013 I psyched myself up for the moment. 

I would not be disappointed.



1 Comment

Thomas Hammill, Sinner or Saint?

11/25/2012

2 Comments

 
Picture
Thomas Hammill was born in Cornwall, growing up in a tradition of hard rock mining and smuggling. Concerning his physical appearance, one man described him as “too neat, too nattily dressed for the frontier.”  Nevertheless Hammill was an experienced prospector who, like Sproule himself, had been all over North America seeking his lucky strike.

Sometime during the morning of June 1, 1885, while working on his portion of the Bluebell Mine, Thomas Hammill was shot in the back. He died within an hour of being discovered.

Six months later, at a courtroom in Victoria, the murdered man was described in quite glowing terms by some of the men who worked for him. And, said one of the witnesses, he didn’t know of anyone who held anything against Hammill, except the accused, Robert Sproule.

Later, a witness for the defense, claimed to have known Hammill when he was in Colorado, and claimed he was notorious for being a claim jumper, even back then.

In 1884 Judge Begbie of the Supreme Court of British Columbia supported this assertion,  describing Hammill’s actions at Big Ledge in the preceding year as “simple claim-jumping.”  The judge ruled against Hammill and returned the Bluebell claim to Sproule.


So what kind of man was Thomas Hammill, really?  Like Sproule, he seems almost to have had almost a split personality.  Competent, ambitious, likeable (to some at least), and quite possibly unscrupulous.  Early in 1882, he joined the employ of John C. Ainsworth of Oakland California, thereby irrevocably tying his destiny to the convoluted actions about to unfold north of the border.

More about Ainsworth in the next post...



To learn more about the Big Ledge project, click HERE.
2 Comments

The Mysterious Modulating Surname

11/17/2012

0 Comments

 
Picture
cemetery in Middle West Pubnico


Deon or d’Eon?
Which and why?

      My surname is one of just a few you will find in the town of  Pubnico, Nova Scotia.  This is a town whose background has been, up until recently, almost exclusively Acadian.   Other prominent family names you’ll find in the area are D’Entrement,  Amirault, Nickerson and Doucette.  The D’Entrements first settled the area way back in 1651.  My father, Roderick Joseph, was the eldest son to Joseph D’Eon and Eveline D’Entrement.

     To the best of my understanding, the spelling of surnames (and other words, for that matter) was largely in a state of flux in the 17th century in both England and France, so to find several variant spellings of a name or word was not unusual.  Thus d’Eon, D’Eon, and even D’eon could be, and can still be, found.

            At some point in my father’s young life—I believe it was when he first enlisted in the Navy—he decided he had had enough with people misspelling and mispronouncing his name. Where does that apostrophe go? And how do you say your name again? So he decided to simplify it to “Deon”, no apostrophe, no silent letters, nothing could go wrong.

            Of course, the irony is that, today, when I tell my name to strangers, they first think, oh that must be “Dion”, right? No?  Well, then “Dionne” like the quintuplets?

Not exactly what my dad had in mind, I think…

            In any case, whether he meant to or not, my father’s dropping of the apostrophe, read as a not so subtle snub of his Acadian ties. Again the Canadian Navy of World War II was likely at fault.  Unquestionably there was a prejudice against recruits with a French background at this time. So my father probably had good reason not to advertise his Acadian origins.

            I grew up in a very different world. Today the Acadian flag flies proudly throughout settlements all over the Maritime provinces of Canada and no one seems especially anxious to dispose of their apostrophes.

            So, when I began publishing material, whether as the author of plays or short stories, magazine articles etc., I decided to give myself a pen-name--but not really a pen name--because I simply fell back to the family’s traditional spelling. And, after all, what is cooler than having an apostrophe in your name?  

            Interestingly, I just came across some information (thanks to a distant D’Eon relative still living in Pubnico) that adds yet a new twist to the story, and  which explains that the original family surname was Duon (with no apostrophe). But an enterprising (if misguided) sea captain of 19th century Pubnico, decided to add one on, and transform one of the vowels, hence, d’Eon.

And so, I’m afraid, it’s likely to remain! (unless my own children decide to become surname mavericks and revert to the more ancient “Duon”.)

For a more complete explanation to this convoluted story, check this: http://www.geocities.com/teddeon509/duondeon.html


0 Comments






    ​Author

    Brian d'Eon, fiction writer: whose work modulates between speculative, historical and magical realism.

    Categories

    All
    1917
    2010
    Ainsworth
    Albert Einstein
    Apollo XI
    Astronomer
    Baillie Grohman
    Baillie-Grohman
    Begbie
    Big Ledge
    Blade Runner 1982
    Blade Runner 2049
    Bluebell Mine
    Book Review
    British Colonist
    Bruce Dern
    Capitalism Vs Climate
    Chapbook
    Civilization
    Climate Change
    Cosmology
    C.S. Lewis
    Dandelions
    Davie
    Dead Crow
    D'Eon
    Deon
    Diana Morita Cole
    Draper Catalogue
    Dreams
    E-books
    Economics
    Editing
    Eileen Delehanty Pearkes
    Eta Carinae
    Fassbender
    Flashbacks
    Gravity
    Gray
    Green Manifesto
    Grohman
    Guess Who's Back?
    Hammill
    Harold Fry
    Hayao Miyazaki
    Hendryx
    Hitler
    Internees
    Isaac Newton
    Jamaica
    Jfk
    Jobs Vs Environment
    John Keats
    Kenneth Clark
    Kootenays
    Korolev
    Lily Langtry
    Lunatics
    Mark Twain
    Matt Haig
    Mikado
    Millet
    Nebraska Movie
    Nelson
    Nixon
    Novel
    Novel Drafts
    Novella
    Novel Structure
    Opium
    Oscar Nominees
    Photography
    Pitch
    Plague
    Point Of View
    Primack & Abrams
    Publishers
    Queenie Hennessy
    Rachel Joyce
    Rejection
    Review
    Richard Bausch
    Sam Mendes
    Saoirse Ronan
    Science And Religion
    Science Literacy
    Sean Arthur Joyce
    Serkis
    Shakespeare
    Sideways
    Sinixt
    Sproule
    Sputnik
    Steamer
    Stranger Things
    Submissions
    Sweet Melancholy
    Telescope
    The Humans
    The Price Of Transcendence
    The Wind Rises
    Travel
    Treasure Beach
    Van Gogh
    Victoria
    View From The Center Of The Universe
    Von Braun
    Winter Photos
    Yeats

    Archives

    February 2022
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    June 2019
    October 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    October 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    July 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.